All Member Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Maintenance Skills Gap

    Posted 06-29-2020 03:36 PM

    I want to talk about the maintenance skills gaps, as I see this a little differently than some.  I see the biggest gap in maintenance process management, not necessarily in technician skills. 

    There are really two types of technicians that we need.  We either need the highly skilled technician or the entry level technician.  This requirement is typically dictated by the maintenance environment at the operation, either proactive or reactive.  Depending on which group we find ourselves in determines which type of technician we will need.  In our very proactive operations, there is the ability and opportunity to hire entry level personnel to train and develop then into the technicians we need.  We also have the ability to create opportunity for high performing operations personnel to enter maintenance as entry level technicians.  Creating this opportunity is highly advantageous for the high performing operations personnel.  It changes their futures, incomes, and career paths and creates a better life for them and their families, so why would we ever hire from outside of the operation?  There is another great benefit, there is a pool of untapped resources in our operational personnel.  They understand considerably more about how the operation works than the technicians will probably ever learn.  These personnel already know the what, when and how we do things.  Since we provide them opportunity, we also have the opportunity for better retention.  They are a perfect fit and complement to the maintenance team.  We have a maintenance training program that is designed to develop these entry level personnel to high level technicians.  This program incorporates E-learning, hands on training, and work experience.  This development program has a two to three year timeframe and moves the technician from entry level to high level over the course of the training program. 

    I will tell you in the very proactive operations we are assigning value added work to new technicians typically the second or third week on the job.  I have seen some operations that have the new technician shadowing another technician for up to six months to train and teach them everything they might need to know before they are on their own.   This shadowing greatly reduces the amount of work the new technician completes during this timeframe.   You may be thinking how is a new technician that doesn't know anything doing value added work?  With well-developed PM inspections and standard work plans along with solid planning this provides many jobs that new technicians can perform at a very high level of execution with minimal knowledge because the knowledge is in the plan and doesn't require the knowledge from the technician.  They just need to be able to follow the plans to execute the work effectively. 

     

    Let's talk about the reactive operation.  When we are very reactive, we don't have time to train technicians.  We need someone who is skilled and that can provide relief to the operation.  We need an experienced firefighter that can contribute immediately to the operations unreliability.  There is a real struggle to find these experienced technicians in some of these locations.  One of the drivers for the shortage of technicians is the increase in the number of energy and technology jobs.  A good technician can increase their pay scale by moving into these higher paying industries.  The biggest gap I see is in some of the traditional manufacturing industries is that the pay scales are not nearly as lucrative as the better paying jobs.  Hiring, highly skilled technicians in lower paying industries is sometimes a challenge so we end up hiring the lower skilled, less experienced technicians. 

    There are three gaps from my point of view.

    1. The gap in not having the proactive operation

    2. The reactive operation must hire the skilled worker

    3. The pay gap

    If these three things are impacting the hiring of maintenance personnel, there is definitely a struggle in finding and hiring the skilled talent.



    ------------------------------
    Mark Robertson
    Reliability Specialist
    Land O'Lakes, Inc.
    Gainesville GA
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Maintenance Skills Gap

    Posted 06-29-2020 04:08 PM
    Marc,

    Interesting comments.  I see the situation a bit different

    In my job, I get to visit a lot of sites over a short period of time in different parts of the world (at least up till March :)).  It differs widely in mindset and educational background for the same title.  Plants also have completely different expectations as to what a "trained" person is in different industries and cultures.  In the US, there is no standard of what "A Mechanical craftsperson" should know, where there are in many other countries.

    I'm not sure you can sell me on that the follow-joe training works.  In my experience a skilled craftsperson may teach a novice, but the novice only picks up 75% of what the skilled man/woman says.  Now, the skilled craftsperson will only tell the young one 75% (Max) of what they know, it's called job security.  Young guy learns .. 75% * 75% = 56% of what the old guy said.  If you do that for a few generations, you run into "skilled" craftspeople that can't tighten a bolt using a bolt torque chart.  Most of the places that swear that it works have no verification system for skills either.

    A proactive operation should be able to focus more on training since they have less emergencies, but in my experience it is more of a management decision.  A reactive organization that have the right management (perhaps newly  hired), could decide to start training people and add/ backfill with a few experienced contractors or new hires to cover the reactive situation.  That is a financial decision, not a "we happen to have some extra time decision" So, I think it is, or should be, more of a financial decision?   

    I'm trying to say that I think it has to be a way of doing business,  to train that is, not an outcome of a situation.

    Just my 5c

    ------------------------------
    Torbjorn Idhammar
    President & CEO
    IDCON, Inc.
    http://www.idcon.com
    Raleigh NC
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Maintenance Skills Gap

    Posted 06-29-2020 05:23 PM

    I agree with you, the meaning of trained can be very loose to very concise.  The shadowing is to be able to address the reactive workload and typically these reactive plants do not have very good planning and scheduling, so more reactive work.  We do train all technicians regardless of experience through the same training program with the same expectations.  We want all technician at the same high level – though all technicians are not created equal.  The proactive operations have the time to develop new technicians and these many times end up being better technicians than the experienced technicians we hire. 

     

    Thanks,

    Mark Robertson

    Reliability Specialist

    Land O' Lakes and
    Purina Animal Nutrition

    770-503-4931

    FeedGreatness125_Logo_Blk_RGB