The failure mode or related equipment would normally be your MTBF, the equipment would be availability - from an industrial engineering perspective.
For example, if the circuit breaker that protects your refrigerator outlet fails, the outlet or the refrigerator did not fail, but the outlet and the refrigerator were not available due to the component failure.
The exception is if you draw a bigger box around your equipment such that all three machines and the component that failed is part of the same equipment. For instance, in a machine shop a CNC lathe stops operating and you have selected the whole machine as a component, then the MTBF would be related to the lathe - although I would not do that myself.
In the wind industry we look at the average tower in the USA being 90% available with 6-8% unavailability due to wind and 2-4% related to operations and maintenance. The maintenance MTBF would be related to the components such as generator, controls, blades, etc.
Within IEEE for electrical systems the MTBF is presented at the component level such as motors, circuit breakers, transformers, etc. (IEEE Gold Book) and not the system level.
------------------------------
Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
Random Past SMRP Chair (2018), 2019+ Govt Relations Smart Grid, Infrastructure and Cybersecurity Working Group Chair, and
President
MotorDoc LLC
Lombard, Illinois
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 01-22-2020 08:54 AM
From: Tamunoteyim Karibo
Subject: Unscheduled Trips
Hello Howard,
Thank you for your feedback.
In this case, the failure mode was already identified in the equipment that caused the shutdown.
But capturing the subsequent shutdowns of other equipment due to the shutdown of the failed equipment is the problem.
In the example i gave, the Uptime of the other 2 subsequent equipment will reduce of course, but the question is will their trips be used to calculate their MTBF?
------------------------------
Tammy Karibo
Reliability Engineer
Enerflex
Abu Dhabi
Original Message:
Sent: 01-22-2020 08:21 AM
From: Howard W Penrose
Subject: Unscheduled Trips
Tammy
We normally use MTBF for a component or system that is directly related to a failure mode. For instance, the MTBF would be related to what caused the low suction, which is the failure mode, and the effect is low suction with extended effects being the shutdown of equipment. The failure mode would effect the availability of the equipment. The reason why you would attach it to the failure mode at the component level (ie: vacuum pump fails resulting in low vacuum resulting in reduced availability) is to use it as a basic measure that can be addressed, such as investigating the cause for the vacuum pump failure (or filter, or whatever is causing the low vacuum).
------------------------------
Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
Random Past SMRP Chair (2018), 2019+ Govt Relations Smart Grid, Infrastructure and Cybersecurity Working Group Chair, and
President
MotorDoc LLC
Lombard, Illinois
Original Message:
Sent: 01-19-2020 05:26 AM
From: Tamunoteyim Karibo
Subject: Unscheduled Trips
Hello Everyone,
Please i have this inquiry.
Are unscheduled trips considered as failures and should they be used to calculate MTBF and subsequently, reliability?
Lets say a machine trips due to factors not relating to its own operations, will this be considered a failure of the machine?
I have 3 machines. if machine 1 shuts down due to a particular failure mode (say low suction), Machines 2 and 3 shut down as well. Will we consider the shut downs of machine 2 and 3 as failures as well?
Thank you for your support
Regards
Tammy Karibo