Kyle,
Have you done a FMEA on the equipment? Do you know the failure modes you are trying to detect?
If the machine normally has a lot of energy, than defects can easily be masked if they have lower energy at early detection points on the P-F curve.
As Jim said, use specific analysis techniques to determine your common faults, bearing, gear, belt, misalignment, unbalance, etc. If you want an overall for peace of mind or to detect something unknown, then trend both until you find an unknown or uncommon failure mode and see which, peak or rms, provided you insight into that failure mode.
Make sure you understand if you vibration output is giving true peak or derived peak (1.4*rms). If derived, then you might as well use rms.
When you choose 1.0 ips as your starting baseline, how did you get to that number? It should already have units of rms or peak.
You can also check with the OEM to see what they recommend.
------------------------------
Mark Wolka
Sr. Product Eng
NSK Corporation
Ann Arbor, MI USA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 03-25-2021 11:20 AM
From: Kyle Burnham
Subject: Machine Vibration Field Monitoring
Hi all. We are working on putting some bearing mounted vibration probes on some very rough running equipment at our facility. They are decanters for those of you that are familiar with them. We expect that 1" in/sec of total vibration is our threshold we no longer want to operate the machine. With Peak to Peak, we see instantaneous spikes much higher than 1", RMS seems to stay much below.
I'm curious what other facilities use for "general" health of machine vibration. RMS or Peak to Peak. We still do our wide spectrum vibration analysis separate of these new probes on the machine. The probes intent is to let us see any potential issues in the machine that will alert us to a problem. Using a peak to peak setting is giving us a lot of unwanted noise, but also may be more accurate. RMS gives us a generally more consistent reading.
Our vibration analysts recommend peak to peak, this is what they use for analysis, but I'm starting to wonder if they are still thinking from an analysts point of view and not a overall view. The RMS seems to be a better method to gauge machine health from a high level.
Please reply and let me know what kind of systems you use for local/data historian reading.
Thank you ,
Kyle
------------------------------
Kyle Burnham
Maintenance Reliability Engineer
Grain Processing Corp
Muscatine IA
------------------------------