Hi Jamie,
In the past, I've had to map out the maintenance work flow and look at shop layout, maintenance resources, spares, etc. In my experience, shop layout was not where my greatest delays were. It was the Maintenance Process (MP) itself coupled with not having the right spare parts. Whether it was centralized or if it was satellite, it didn't matter much because spare parts were my biggest issue. Not having the right part at the right time at the right location caused my biggest delays. Also, making the MP simpler by removing non-value added steps created a more efficient team - couple that with good planning, critical spares, and PM parts kitting.
Also, having a specific processes that can be replicated in other aspects of maintenance was also a benefit; example: the PDM Process would be the same for Vibration, IR, UST, and OA. You would train to one process regardless of where your resources are coming from (internal or external).
I do agree with James on Spagetti Diagrams. If your mainteanance process is heavy on a repeat repair process (i.e. motor repair shop), then a 'visible' work flow could be very useful especially if you have high turn-over.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Dan
------------------------------
Daniel Vega
RE II
Hope Mills NC
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-19-2019 02:34 PM
From: Jamie Borley
Subject: Maintenance Workshop Layout Optimisation
Hi Guys and Gals,
Has anyone done any work in this area?..Any case studies? Recommended resources?
Thanks
Jamie
------------------------------
Jamie Borley MSc CMRP CEng
Swansea, UK
------------------------------