All Member Open Forum

Greetings
Could you post the subject topic for rotating equipment maintenance and reliability
Setting up correct maintenance and reliability program for an asset which is installed at operating facility must require following reliability enablers for smooth and steady operation
1. Asset classification and identification with respect to name and home typically call SAP equipment number and tag number.
2. Spare parts catalog planning just after placing purchase order for material scope of supply
3. Setting up right maintenance plan as per OEM recommendations
4. Update and maintain operational and process related documents such ad OIM and P&ID and ensure asset safety and integrity safe operating limits are reviewed and established
5. Baseline asset data for life cycle costing and other considerations such as lubricant type ,use and compatibility.
6. You need to know how critical is the asset for your normal operation so criticality ranking such as A- critical, B- Important and C- normal asset must be done as a part of maintenance and operation planning
7- Certain maintenance tasks must be considered for the asset having no residency and unable to perform maintenance due to accessibility for craft persons to execute PM.
If you need more information to roll out this program at your facility please do not hesitate to contact me
Regards
Tariq Nadeem
Saudi Aramco


Sent from my iPhone

Hy Tariq,

Thank you for sharing this structured approach - I fully agree that these elements form a solid foundation for a maintenance and reliability program, especially for rotating equipment.

From my experience in industrial environments, the main challenge is not defining these enablers, but ensuring their consistent application over time.

In practice, I see three key gaps that often impact the effectiveness of such programs:

1. Data quality and discipline
Even when asset identification, spare parts, and master data are well defined initially, maintaining data accuracy in systems like SAP becomes a challenge. Over time, inconsistencies reduce the effectiveness of planning and decision-making.

2. Gap between OEM recommendations and real operation
Maintenance plans based purely on manufacturer guidelines often do not reflect actual operating conditions. Adjustments based on field data (failure history, load variations, environment) are essential to achieve true reliability.

3. Execution under operational pressure
In many cases - especially during shutdowns or short-duration projects - maintenance practices are adapted due to time constraints. This can compromise long-term reliability if not properly managed.

In my view, what differentiates a successful program is not only the structure itself, but the ability to:

• Continuously update and validate data
• Integrate predictive maintenance tools (such as vibration analysis and condition monitoring)
• Align maintenance strategy with actual operational risks and constraints

The framework described is very robust - the real challenge lies in sustaining it with discipline and adapting it to the operational reality.

Best Regards

------------------------------
Adilan Bittar
Financial Director
RAL Manutenção e Montagens LTDA
ARACRUZ
------------------------------