Some large rotating assets, such as turbines or centrifuges, have real-time hard-wired RMS vibration sensors, so they can be automatically shut down if there is a problem that causes vibration to reach an unsafe level. We have a few critical pumps that run infrequently, and that can't be started manually if there doesn't happen to be enough liquid in the supply tank, so I plan to put wireless full-spectrum vibration sensors on them. I'm also considering oil analysis sensors for air compressors, where it's difficult to pull a sample. Other than that, for most of my assets I have yet to see the value in installing permanent sensors. To cover every asset with good vibration sensors would cost 4.5 to 6 million dollars. (I could do it for much less than that if I bought RMS-only sensors, but those don't provide enough information to be useful.)
For less than a few million dollars I have hired some technicians and trained them in ultrasound-based lubrication. They visit every rotating asset on some frequency (which depends on each asset's criticality) and they listen to it. The more critical assets also get checked with route-based vibration analysis. This way, everything gets a PdM check and everything gets lubricated properly. Also, by paying attention and using all of their senses, the technicians identify and correct all kinds of problems that fixed sensors will never pick up, such as leaks, unusual noises, damaged or missing guards, tripping hazards, and so on.
One could argue that, by not being online, we aren't seeing faults the moment they appear. Most faults take a long time to develop, so (for most assets) it's normally not necessary to see them immediately. I've been pleased with the reduction in unplanned downtime that we have experienced with this approach.
------------------------------
Dale Nicholson, PE, CMRP, CRL
Reliability Engineering Mgr
Evonik Corp
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 04-10-2026 01:11 PM
From: Linda Perry
Subject: Sensors in CBM: Are You Seeing Real Value?
Good morning everyone,
I wanted to revisit a topic from a slightly different angle-how many of you are using sensors (vibration, oil analysis, infrared, etc.) as part of your condition-based maintenance strategy?
More importantly, are you seeing measurable value from that data-fewer failures, improved planning, or even cost impact?
If not, what's the biggest challenge: budget, bandwidth, or turning data into actionable insight?
Curious how others are making this work in practice.
------------------------------
Linda Perry
Senior Business Development Executive
The Viswa Group
American Canyon CA
------------------------------