Hi Brian,
I've been in your shoes before. After devoting 20+ years of my career in maintenance in various industries (petrochemical, specialty chemical, oil refinery, paper mill, plastics, etc), I was evaluating a CMMS that is most functional for the site, user friendly at a reasonable cost, reliable with excellent service support and company policy compliant. This manufacturing site did not have a CMMS but already use SAP for other modules which is the standard for this large global company. However, implementing SAP PM is very costly and I was left to find another one.
Not counting the non-Windows softwares, I have used GPMaTe, SAP PM and Maintenance Connection. Each of these have their strengths and weaknesses but I wanted something simple and user friendly for 70 employees with 6 maintenance techs. I listed the basic functionality needed at that time, such as, maintenance work management including planning and scheduling, resource management, maintenance cost tracking, equipment history, and must be cloud hosted. I had demonstration done by Maximo, AssetPoint, FT Maintenance and eMaint. My pick at this time was eMaint but IT senior management shut it down. So, I ended up with SAP.
eMaint is the most user friendly with more functionality than I need. SAP PM is a very powerful CMMS that integrates seamlessly with procurement, materials, project management modules. Custom reports can also enhance reporting.
Good luck our your selection process.
------------------------------
Ben Moreno
Bayer Crop Science
Houston TX
------------------------------